There is currently little evidence that
climate change is happening. However, there are still groups of people who
believe that global warming is a hoax and that, in fact, is is causing global
cooling, rather than warming. It is the case of researchers of the paranormal
as Luis Carlos Campos, which even has books published on the subject.
Others directly deny both cooling and warming.
Nothing is changing on the planet. How to tell who is right? Most will appeal
to what the scientists say. But it is not so simple: what exactly is a
scientist? Can a physicist speak the same way about global warming than, for
example, a chemical?
In science, the majorities are not proof of
anything. I.e., although it is often used the sentence "most scientists
think that...", this phrase has no value on its own if it is not used as a
metaphor of "most of the studies published in high impact journals, as
well as the subsequent meta-analysis, suggest that...".
Science is based on evidence, evidence and
experiments, and especially to know explain the concatenation of events that
produced certain effect. If based on the opinion of scientists, without more
(and us fiáramos of his opinions, no more), then no would be doing science, but
film critics, for example.